Discover how important that date stamp really is. By Sarah Jio. Jan 7, 2016. Getty Images Use by, sell by or best before…confusing, right? Next time you're trying to make sense of a food label, remember these guidelines from Lindsay Baker, RD, LD, a registered dietitian and food safety expert in Augusta, Georgia: • Sell by most often is grocer terminology, letting the meat or dairy clerk know when to swap out stock. While you can normally safely eat a food a few days after a sell-by date, it's not recommended to go much beyond it. • Best before refers to quality and taste standards. The length of time that food is good after this date depends on the product. Refer to the.
It's all in your mindset. Age is kind of a thing in IT, but if it were the thing, a number of programmers would not work in my IT shop. We have over 200 employees, and over 100 of them are programmers, and many of them are probably older than you. You should asses your skills, abilities, passions and talents. See what you're the best at in programming, and make sure you showcase that.
We have recently hired people well over 50. I know you have what it takes. I think as we get older and more experienced we expect more money. As new graduates come out of school they are willing to work for less. True, they are unproven and inexperienced but if you can get them for 2/3 the pay it sometimes unfortunately is worth the risk.
So yes, we are beyond our best if used by date. Our society does not value seniority and experience in the technology sector
best if used by date stamp - McGimpsey & Associates : Excel : Time and date stamps
- negative short forms usedn't to, usen't to ['ju:sntu] ( I, he etc) was in the habit of (doing something); (I, he etc) was (usually) in a particular position, state etc: I used to swim every day; She used not to be so forgetful; They used to play golf, didn't they?; Didn't you use(d) to live near me?; There used to be a butcher's shop there, didn't there?) costumar См.
также в других словарях: • — UK US noun [C] US COMMERCE ► BEST BEFORE DATE(Cf. ↑best before date) … Financial and business terms • — ➔ date1 * * * best before date UK US noun [C] UK (US best if used by date) COMMERCE ► the date after which food or drink begins to lose its quality or taste: »The company has new machines that print best before dates onto packaging.
→ Compare… … Financial and business terms • — Different style conventions and habits exist around the world for dates and times in writing and speaking. Examples:*The order that a year, month, and day are written.
*How weeks are identified. *The 24 hour clock and/or the 12 hour clock. *The… … Wikipedia • — Infobox Co operative company name = Best Western International, Inc company company type = Marketing cooperative foundation = 1946 location = Phoenix, AZ, USA key people = M. K. Guertin, founder David Kong, President and CEO [cite web title =… … Wikipedia • — (or just BAT) is a term applied with regulations on limiting pollutant discharges with regard to the abatement strategy.
Similar terms are best available techniques , best practicable means or best practicable environmental option . The term… … Wikipedia • — refers to a drug that can be used to assist in the execution of a sexual assault, such as date rape.
Drugs used to facilitate rape may have sedative, hypnotic, dissociative, and/or amnesiac effects, and can be added to a food or drink without the … Wikipedia • — noun The date (stamped, etc on a package esp with the wording ‘best before (eg) 12 September’) up to which a manufacturer can guarantee the good quality of a consumer (usu food) product • • • Main Entry: ↑best * * * best before date UK US noun… … Useful english dictionary • — Date In the United States, dates are traditionally written in the month day year order, that is, in neither descending nor ascending order of significance.
(In computing, this would be called a middle endian order.) This order is used in both the … Wikipedia • — Infobox Company company name=Best Buy Co., Inc. company logo= company type=Public (nyse|BBY) company slogan=You, Happier.
foundation=1966 location=Richfield, Minnesota key people=Richard M. Schulze, Founder Chairman Brad Anderson, CEO Vice… … Wikipedia • — best1 W1S1 [best] adj [superlative of good] [: Old English; Origin: betst] 1.) better than anything else or anyone else in quality, skill, how effective it is etc ▪ He won the best actor award. ▪ What s the best way to cook this fish? ▪ The best… … Dictionary of contemporary English • — infobox concert tour concert tour name = Best of Both Worlds Tour artist = Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus album = Hannah Montana Jonas Brothers Insomniatic start date = October 18, 2007 end date = January 31, 2008 number of legs = 3 number of shows … Wikipedia Книги • , Wu Ying.
Large producers have started to use gas injection for their applications and in the future it is predicted that this trend will increase. This book is the most comprehensive and up-to-date… электронная книга • , Marie DiTommaso.
Detailed, practical coverage of GAAP, tailored to not-for-profit organizations Wiley Not-for-Profit GAAP 2016 is a thorough examination of the authoritative standards for measurement,… электронная книга • , Danny Ayers. A complete update covering the many advances to the XML language The XML language has become the standard for writing documents on the Internet and is constantly improving and evolving.
This… электронная книга
Sometimes, we might think our best content deserves a bunch of flowers, a reasonably-priced pasta, and a glass of chardonnay at the local Italian bistro. But, bad puns aside, the decision whether or not to date your (*groan*) is also about making the right impression on someone you hope will still be around when the coffee arrives: the reader. Joe Pulizzi recently triggered a conversation on on whether marketers should date-stamp their content.
And it was very interesting to see a clear split in opinions emerge in the comments. Many declared that they routinely ignore undated posts. However, others argued that removing the date from blog posts dramatically increased search traffic. (Notice the “reader versus publisher” attitudes there…) So, who’s right?
Is the whole notion of evergreen content undermined by dates that gradually erode the value many readers place upon it? Does dating your content actually * ahem* date it?
Use-by date? As a writer, I constantly use the internet for research. Therefore, it has become a habit for me to always look for the date on a post or article before reading, or even before clicking through from the search engine results. The date is essential to help me assess the context of the information, as well as filtering the masses of content to find the most relevant facts and most recent statistics. This is why I commonly refine my Google searches to within the last 12 months.
Knowing when a post was written doesn’t impact the evergreen nature of a post if the content is still good, the information is still accurate, and the topic is still relevant.
What does impact the evergreen nature of a post is not the date it was written, but whether or not the subject matter itself is out of date. And without dating the post, the reader has no way of assessing that possibility.
Speed date? Some topics constantly evolve, with every new day bringing new information, new ideas, and new rules. This makes the date extremely important to avoid mistakes. My recent article for Chief Content Officer magazine on Facebook’s EdgeRank, , was only in print for about a month before Facebook , immediately making my column less relevant. With magazine deadlines running months in advance, and the digital landscape changing on an almost daily basis, I’m surprised that doesn’t happen to me more often.
Naturally, there are also many topics and categories of information that stay relevant and accurate for far longer. For example, the number of planets in our solar system can be assumed to be pretty much the same tomorrow as it is today.
Therefore, can we assume any planetary themed content is evergreen? And if so, why date-stamp it? Well, on August 24, 2006, that number did change when lost its membership card to the planetary club. What was nine became eight overnight.
Importantly, the date became a line in the sand, marking every planetary article and textbook published before the 24th as a little less reliable and a little more outdated.
Yet, if you search the word “” in Google, the top listing (undated) is still . Granted, the site does include a correction further down to clear up the Pluto confusion; but by that stage, young Billy has already scribbled the wrong answer on his homework sheet. The same website was also the number one listing back in 2009 when I used this example for a magazine column on how the internet can make bad ideas and outdated information immortal.
Back then (thankfully, not now) the second listing in those results — clearly dated prior to 2006 — still ranked Pluto as one of the nine, with no correction. Sure, the offending page has probably seen its search ranking for the term erode over the last five years because of the date on the post.
But isn’t that how it should be if the search engines are to avoid devolving into inaccurate collections of outdated information? The mere fact that I’m able to make the same argument five years later by using the same example sort of proves my point. Dating content helps clean things up, both in the search engines and in the mind of the reader.
Blind date? Sure, removing dates may mean more people click through to older content from Google (unwittingly so?). But the difference in click-through rate is most likely because people want to see dates and are less likely to click-through to something that the search listing indicates isn’t fresh.
The dating information merely filtered these readers out before the click, instead of after. When they don’t see a date on the post they land on, how many might click back to find something more likely to be fresh, or might continue reading only to view the content as potentially unreliable or less relevant?
If more search traffic is the prime argument for removing the date stamp from blog content, then doesn’t it also prove that people care about dates? And if so, aren’t we being slightly deceptive in trying to conceal the context or relevance of a post in the name of more traffic?
Content marketing is about heralding the quality, utility, and relevance of content above the SEO tricks designed to merely drive less qualified clicks, surely.
But you can have your cake and eat it too. Post-date? By postdating blog content, I don’t mean that we should put future dates on our posts in the same way we might postdate a check. But why can’t we revise the dates on our content “ex post facto”?
Ian Lyons is one digital marketer who has made postdating a best practice. Until recently, Lyons was responsible for BeReady, a major content initiative targeting business travelers.
The project ended last year, but I was fascinated with Lyons’ approach to content dating: “We never considered not dating our content,” comments Lyons. “One thing we did do, however, is [have] both the original ‘posted’ date and ‘updated on’ date so people knew that we had at least ensured the latest information was presented.” For example, an article on how to get a SIM card at Hong Kong airport was updated with the new locations of telco provider booths as the airport terminal changed.
The post remained relevant, useful, and highly popular for months, if not years. “In the CMS, I had a ‘to be reviewed date.’ which varied by article type, but defaulted to 3 months post publish date,” explained Lyons.
“This gave the editors a nice moving calendar of stories to re-assign to writers.” The site constantly and systematically reviewed and refreshed its content — alongside new articles — to keep everything as current as possible.
And the dating of the content was an important part of this strategy. “One pet peeve I have is lazy date formatting. Unless you’re doing up-to-the-minute news, there’s no need to clutter the UI.” Lyons recommends a simple, concise, and unambiguous format: Posted: Jan. 12, 2013 | Revised: April 12, 2013. The BeReady team also implemented the dating markup at so that the right dating information, including updates, would display in search engine results pages (SERPs).
Remember, this is digital. And digital content has the ability to adapt and change, unlike the printed page. Why should our content be locked in amber, a fossilized record of some other time, unable to grow and evolve ? If our content dates, or even becomes extinct, it’s only because we allow it to . So maybe we need to think a little harder about how we use the dating of our content to signal context and relevance to potential readers.
What do you think? Does removing the dates from posts make the content “timeless” or less trusted? Looking for additional best practice tips for creating quality content? to join Jonathan Crossfield and many more content marketing experts at Content Marketing World Sydney, March 31 – April 2, 2014.
Cover image via Author: Jonathan Crossfield If it involves putting words in a row with the occasional punctuation, then Jonathan has most likely given it a bash; from copy writing to screenwriting, blogging to journalism. He has won awards for his articles on digital marketing and his over-opinionated blog, . Follow Jonathan on Twitter .
Other posts by
Expiry Date Stamping Code Printing Machine Electric Ribbon Hot Code Printer