Find class action lawsuit Stock Images in HD and millions of other royalty-free stock photos, illustrations, and vectors in the Shutterstock collection. Thousands of new, high-quality pictures added every day You can also switch to view results based on popularity or best match. Got it! Filters.
Lawsuit Subject of lawsuit Court of decision Year of decision causes of action included "conversion, unjust enrichment, restitution, the right to an accounting, human rights violations and violations of international law". demolition of public housing damaged by Hurricane Katrina United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 2009 Augustus v.
ABM failure to provide rest periods to workers California Supreme Court 2016 Indian trust assets 2009 honorable discharge under "" United States Court of Federal Claims 2013 right to recommend medical marijuana United States district court racial profiling and unlawful stop and frisk Daniela Apostol v.
Eastman Kodak Company false advertising, unfair enrichment, fraudulent concealment, unfair competition funding and arming known terrorist organizations discriminating against women in promotions, pay, and job assignments United States Supreme Court 2011 EEOC v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America creation and long-term toleration of a sexually 1998 EEOC (Janice Smith) v.
Wal-Mart Stores hiring decisions based on gender misappropriation of users' names and likenesses United States District Court for the Northern District of California racial and gender discrimination in employment and marketing undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy too mechanistic in its use of race as a factor in admissions Supreme Court of the United States 2003 denial of access to land and property United States District Court for the District of Columbia owners of vehicles with faulty instrument clusters receive "special coverage" U.S.
District Court in Seattle 2008 surveillance of telecommunications video game responsibility for murders sexual harassment, abusive language, threats, stalking and intimidation surveillance 2010 internet privacy and social media United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2010 racial bias in written test for employment involuntary sterilization health insurance not covering prescription contraceptives forcible kidnapping and imprisonment racial segregation and school busing stock market collusion e-commerce website accessibility anti-abortion activities Supreme Court of the United States 1994 price fixing and other allegedly anti-competitive trade practices in the credit card industry 2012 racial discrimination in its allocation of farm loans and assistance 1999/2010 Price v.
Philip Morris, Inc cigarette company advertising class action led by plaintiff's attorney Stephen Tillery resulted in $10.1 billion judgement Madison County, Illinois 2003/2006 promoting disorder ADHD to increase drug profits charges schools secretly spied on students through surreptitiously and remotely activated webcams embedded in school-issued laptops the students were using at home; privacy rights filed 2010; pending certification prisoners' rights United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas 1979 anti-abortion activities Supreme Court of the United States 2003 anti-abortion activities Supreme Court of the United States 2006 gasoline additive damaging fuel supply systems of cars employment discrimination based on sex 1980 limiting credit card late fees and other penalties Supreme Court of the United States 1996 Social Security regulation on determining disability for children Supreme Court of the United States 1990 misleading advertising United States District Court for the Northern District of California use of secret contact information to steal talent unlawful detainment false advertising, unfair business practices, breach of contract, fraud, deceit and/or misrepresentation retrieving deposits from dormant bank accounts 2000 Lawsuit Subject of lawsuit Court of decision Year of decision contracts that exclude class action arbitration Supreme Court of the United States 2011 preempting state law class action claims Supreme Court of the United States 2006 required parties to class action United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Class action lawyers • (class action lawyer) • (class action lawyer) • (class action lawyer) • (lawyer representing employees in class actions) • (Canadian class action lawyer) • (lawyer representing corporations in class actions) Class action law firms • (law firm representing consumers in class actions) • (class action law firm) • (national worker and consumer rights class action law firm) • (law firm representing consumers in class actions) Other persons involved in class actions • (class action lead plaintiff) • (American jurist, a pioneer in class action) • (co-founder of a class action litigation law firm) Legislation • (in the US) • (in the US) Other related topics • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • \ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (in Canada) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Up to date database for ongoing class action settlements, weekly newsletter, largest class action news site • Current class action lawsuits and class action lawsuit settlements • Class Action lawsuits and legal news • The most comprehensive list for class action lawsuits • Largest Canadian class action database • (class action sex discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart) • • (Listing of racial discrimination class actions in the Federal government) • (December 3, 2009) • (30 April 2010) • • • Class action news & analysis primarily focused on product liability and consumer products]
best together dating class action lawsuit price match - Class Action Lawsuits Center
• • © 2018. All Rights Reserved. Morgan & Morgan, PA. 20 North Orange Ave, Suite 1600, Orlando, FL 32801 Attorney Advertising. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. The information contained on this Web site is not medical advice and is not intended to be medical advice. Nor is it a substitute for seeking appropriate medical, or other professional advice.
In April we looked at another federal lawsuit which claims eHarmony's matching system is not scientifically proven (see ). The lawyers for the lawsuit (Lange & Koncius LLP) have now setup a website for people to get more information. You can find the website called eHarmony Class Action Litigation (eHarmonyClassAction.com). Thanks to the unofficial eHarmony Blog for this information. In my opinion, from all of the information I have read about dating sites, eHarmony probably has put the most effort into their matching system.
They have a number of doctors on staff at eHarmony Labs who are experts in their fields of study and whose purpose is to research and improve the matching system. eHarmony spends over $3 million a year at this. While, they haven't released much scientific proof or had many independent studies done (as far as I know), if any dating site can back up their matching system with scientific research, it is eHarmony.
For more on eHarmony Labs, read
Caravan migrants file class-action lawsuit against Trump