Best matchmakers sacramento county ca

best matchmakers sacramento county ca

Sacramento is the capital of California and a city that is rich with history, culture and countless things to impress you! The famous saying from Sacramento is that “California begins here” and after spending a little bit of time here you will understand why. It is a city that has never forgotten its past and one that continues to remember the Gold Rush. It is one of the easiest cities to fall in love with so let’s take a look at the best things to do in Sacramento. 1. Take A Visit To Old Sacramento State Historic Park. Source: Flickr.

best matchmakers sacramento county ca

Sacramento Sacramento County is the central county of the metropolitan area. The county covers about 994 square miles (2,570 km 2) in the northern portion of the , on into . Sacramento County extends from the low delta lands between the and , including , north to about ten miles (16 km) beyond the State Capitol and east into the foothills of the .

The southernmost portion of Sacramento County has direct access to . Sacramento County was one of the original counties of California, which were created in 1850 at the time of statehood. The county was named after the , which forms its western border. The river was named by Spanish cavalry officer for the Santisimo Sacramento (Most Holy Sacrament), referring to the Catholic . , a member of the , is buried in the old Cemetery. According to the , the county has a total area of 994 square miles (2,570 km 2), of which 965 square miles (2,500 km 2) is land and 29 square miles (75 km 2) (3.0%) is water.

Most of the county is at an elevation close to sea level, with some areas below sea level. The highest point in the county is at 828 feet (252 m), in the southeast part of . Major watercourses in the county include the , , , a tributary of the , and , a tributary of the Sacramento River. Adjacent counties • - northwest • - north • - northeast • - east • - south • - southwest • - west • - west National protected areas • • • 2011 Population, race, and income Total population 1,408,480 White 845,111 60.0% Black or African American 144,018 10.2% American Indian or Alaska Native 13,019 0.9% Asian 201,766 14.3% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 13,912 1.0% Some other race 111,587 7.9% Two or more races 79,067 5.6% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 298,709 21.2% Per capita income $27,180 Median household income $56,553 Median family income $65,720 Places by population, race, and income Places by population and race Place Type Population White Other Asian Black or African American Native American Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 46,343 66.8% 10.5% 10.8% 10.4% 1.6% 13.7% 91,132 73.4% 11.4% 5.5% 8.5% 1.2% 17.5% 61,710 82.0% 7.2% 5.1% 4.4% 1.3% 10.6% 84,112 82.2% 10.5% 2.7% 3.0% 1.6% 16.5% 1,188 68.5% 25.3% 6.2% 0.0% 0.0% 24.4% 484 52.5% 44.6% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 80.8% 146,537 44.3% 17.3% 25.2% 11.1% 2.1% 19.4% 5,203 83.0% 8.6% 5.0% 1.1% 2.3% 10.4% 30,297 86.9% 5.9% 5.2% 1.5% 0.5% 9.3% 49,869 42.9% 13.2% 26.4% 14.4% 3.1% 30.8% 70,564 71.6% 7.3% 13.4% 6.7% 1.1% 11.4% 32,798 68.1% 15.1% 5.0% 10.7% 1.1% 21.6% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5,675 37.9% 21.3% 22.4% 15.0% 3.3% 43.5% 23,393 67.5% 26.3% 2.0% 2.7% 1.5% 38.5% 8,272 71.5% 7.0% 18.2% 3.3% 0.0% 5.8% 1,019 93.3% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.6% 206 78.2% 18.4% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 69.9% 702 72.4% 16.0% 10.4% 1.3% 0.0% 40.3% 10,971 68.0% 12.3% 7.6% 11.4% 0.7% 16.8% 13,348 45.7% 22.2% 19.2% 9.5% 3.4% 46.2% 946 35.1% 20.6% 26.7% 17.5% 0.0% 24.4% 4,650 54.8% 12.5% 16.9% 10.2% 5.5% 14.3% 42,888 62.0% 17.0% 4.5% 14.3% 2.3% 22.8% 33,733 88.0% 5.9% 2.8% 2.1% 1.1% 9.5% 14,149 56.1% 14.2% 12.3% 16.6% 0.9% 44.7% 64,072 62.7% 14.3% 12.5% 8.8% 1.7% 20.1% 6,376 86.0% 4.8% 4.9% 4.2% 0.0% 6.0% 14,366 76.1% 14.0% 5.7% 3.7% 0.6% 18.8% 23,020 62.7% 14.1% 10.1% 12.1% 1.0% 21.6% 463,537 49.3% 15.2% 19.1% 13.9% 2.5% 26.0% 25,993 47.3% 10.3% 28.2% 12.3% 1.9% 15.1% 1,294 62.1% 20.2% 17.2% 0.0% 0.5% 18.3% 4,364 70.4% 13.8% 8.7% 1.0% 6.1% 17.0% ‡ Data for Sacramento County area of this CDP Places by population and income Place Type Population Per capita income Median household income Median family income 46,343 $25,932 $71,211 $73,392 91,132 $32,263 $46,694 $64,453 61,710 $32,140 $53,686 $71,907 84,112 $25,778 $54,575 $64,473 1,188 $35,302 $99,635 $102,586 484 $80,503 $46,705 $45,682 146,537 $29,188 $78,564 $83,346 5,203 $23,620 $66,435 $66,157 30,297 $40,601 $72,381 $90,982 49,869 $17,032 $43,441 $48,022 70,564 $37,187 $95,143 $113,338 32,798 $20,591 $47,615 $47,439 0 23 $23,857 $43,250 5,675 $11,800 $28,666 $30,417 23,393 $21,425 $59,125 $63,266 8,272 $57,104 $112,111 $117,259 1,019 $28,500 $82,639 $83,194 206 $18,224 $48,214 $77,895 702 $19,215 $30,795 $32,841 10,971 $29,193 $56,420 $60,721 13,348 $12,256 $29,958 $30,261 946 $16,636 $44,531 $44,375 4,650 $32,276 $83,208 $81,310 42,888 $17,815 $41,774 $45,785 33,733 $31,102 $68,938 $77,341 14,149 $17,268 $41,524 $42,445 64,072 $24,967 $53,878 $60,122 6,376 $52,821 $100,878 $112,284 14,366 $23,808 $57,891 $69,136 23,020 $25,030 $56,314 $64,345 463,537 $25,744 $50,781 $57,192 25,993 $27,419 $76,449 $84,100 1,294 $34,296 $64,770 $80,385 4,364 $35,280 $87,000 $107,404 2010 Census Pop.

%± 9,087 — 24,142 165.7% 26,830 11.1% 34,390 28.2% 40,339 17.3% 45,915 13.8% 67,806 47.7% 91,029 34.2% 141,999 56.0% 170,333 20.0% 277,140 62.7% 502,778 81.4% 631,498 25.6% 783,381 24.1% 1,041,219 32.9% 1,223,499 17.5% 1,418,788 16.0% Est. 2017 1,530,615 7.9% U.S. Decennial Census 1790–1960 1900–1990 1990–2000 2010–2015 The reported that Sacramento County had a population of 1,418,788. The racial makeup of Sacramento County was 815,151 (57.5%) , 200,228 (15.4%) , 14,308 (1.0%) , 203,211 (14.3%) , 13,858 (1.0%) , 131,691 (9.3%) from , and 93,511 (6.6%) from two or more races.

or of any race were 306,196 persons (21.6%). Population reported at The County Total Population two or more races or (of any race) Sacramento County 1,418,788 815,151 147,058 14,308 203,211 13,858 131,691 93,511 306,196 Total Population two or more races or (of any race) 83,301 66,856 2,751 753 2,714 363 5,348 4,516 13,734 153,015 70,478 20,172 965 40,261 1,807 10,231 12,101 27,581 72,203 53,627 4,140 427 9,000 173 1,818 3,018 8,064 23,647 15,639 430 361 815 108 4,834 1,460 10,113 804 542 10 10 41 4 139 58 316 64,776 39,123 8,561 668 7,831 556 5,517 4,520 12,740 466,488 210,006 80,005 5,291 85,503 6,655 57,573 33,125 125,276 Total Population two or more races or (of any race) 45,770 29,200 4,039 402 6,090 407 2,284 3,348 6,635 92,186 64,688 8,977 948 5,152 531 7,420 5,470 17,147 61,762 49,776 4,972 546 2,653 287 2,035 3,493 7,218 1,195 981 6 24 8 0 108 68 242 355 247 0 6 4 0 75 23 200 5,492 4,453 117 77 208 48 302 287 859 30,912 26,479 729 255 1,289 57 738 1,365 2,954 47,513 15,034 9,521 543 13,605 815 6,756 3,239 13,048 33,121 21,249 4,628 357 1,731 208 3,362 2,586 7,579 155 119 0 0 5 0 20 11 42 38 34 0 0 2 0 1 1 6 5,800 1,704 1,047 105 1,113 67 1,317 447 2,345 7,912 5,837 195 20 1,426 28 97 309 515 1,184 934 20 13 64 7 105 41 254 271 135 0 15 15 1 70 35 137 10,802 7,315 1,084 76 766 87 671 803 1,756 13,729 5,091 3,493 246 2,394 196 3,487 822 6,790 4,451 467 99 13 27 21 31 85 110 743 2,477 393 42 850 84 267 338 704 45,794 27,000 6,003 603 2,067 300 4,709 3,132 10,077 33,960 29,679 463 316 1,040 75 879 1,508 3,448 14,670 5,225 3,696 182 1,997 300 3,161 1,109 6,185 5,488 4,874 130 33 158 6 81 206 425 15,106 11,654 502 235 665 62 1,304 821 3,033 22,681 13,496 2,720 310 2,419 134 1,754 1,848 4,587 24,836 11,306 2,426 163 7,293 256 1,682 1,710 4,414 1,542 943 15 24 110 0 402 48 673 5,363 4,234 169 45 289 13 343 270 683 Total Population two or more races or (of any race) All others not CDPs (combined) 24,823 14,249 2,472 234 3,606 202 2,770 1,290 6,306 2000 As of the census of 2000, there were 1,223,499 people, 453,602 households, and 297,562 families residing in the county.

The population density was 1,267 people per square mile (489/km 2). There were 474,814 housing units at an average density of 492/sq mi (190/km 2). The racial makeup of the county was 64.0% , 10.6% or , 1.09% , 13.5% , 0.6% , 7.5% from , and 5.8% from two or more races.

19.3% of the population were or of any race. 10.2% were of , 7.0% English, 6.7% and 5.1% American ancestry according to . 75.7% spoke only English at home; 10.0% spoke Spanish, 1.5% , 1.4% Chinese or , 1.3% , 1.2% and 1.2% . There were 453,602 households out of which 33.7% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 46.4% were married couples living together, 14.1% had a female householder with no husband present, and 34.4% were non-families.

26.7% of all households were made up of individuals and 8.0% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.64 and the average family size was 3.24. In the county, the population was spread out with 27.6% under the age of 18, 9.5% from 18 to 24, 31.0% from 25 to 44, 20.9% from 45 to 64, and 11.1% who were 65 years of age or older.

The median age was 34 years. For every 100 females, there were 95.9 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.5 males. The median income for a household in the county was $43,816, and the median income for a family was $50,717.

Males had a median income of $39,482 versus $31,569 for females. The per capita income for the county was $21,142. About 10.3% of families and 14.1% of the population were below the poverty line, including 20.2% of those under age 18 and 6.6% of those age 65 or over. Main article: Government The is defined and authorized under the , , and the Charter of the County of Sacramento. Much of the is in practice the responsibility of county governments such as the Government of Sacramento County, while municipalities such as the city of and provide additional, often non-essential services.

It is composed of the elected five-member , several other elected offices including the , , and , and numerous county departments and entities under the supervision of the County Executive Officer. In addition, several entities of the have jurisdiction conterminous with Sacramento County, such as the . Under its foundational Charter, the five-member elected (BOS) is the county legislature. The board operates in a legislative, executive, and capacity. The current members are: • , district 1 • , district 2 • , district 3 • , district 4 • , district 5 The Sacramento County Code is the law of Sacramento County in the form of passed by the Board of Supervisors.

Policing The Sacramento County Sheriff provides court protection, jail management, and coroner service for the entire county. It provides patrol and detective services for the unincorporated areas of the county. Incorporated municipalities within the county that have their own municipal police departments or contract with the Sacramento County sheriff for their policing are: Elk Grove, 170,000, municipal department; Citrus Heights, 88,000, municipal department; Folsom, 78,000, municipal department; Isleton, sheriff contract; Rancho Cordova, 73,000, sheriff contract; Galt, population 26,000, municipal department.

Voter registration Population and registered voters Total population 1,408,480 Registered voters 697,505 49.5% Democratic 306,215 43.9% Republican 222,338 31.9% Democratic–Republican spread +83,877 +12.0% Independent 20,045 2.9% Green 3,878 0.6% Libertarian 4,175 0.6% Peace and Freedom 2,571 0.4% Americans Elect 33 0.0% Other 1,320 0.2% No party preference 136,930 19.6% Cities by population and voter registration Cities by population and voter registration City Population Registered voters Democratic Republican D–R spread Other No party preference 84,112 50.4% 34.4% 41.4% -7.0% 9.5% 18.4% 146,537 53.5% 43.5% 32.0% +11.5% 7.0% 20.4% 70,564 51.7% 29.6% 44.3% -14.7% 7.9% 21.5% 23,393 43.2% 35.3% 40.2% -4.9% 9.1% 19.2% 702 47.9% 52.4% 22.9% +29.5% 8.0% 20.5% 64,072 49.0% 43.1% 33.2% +9.9% 7.5% 19.0% 463,537 47.5% 52.4% 21.9% +30.5% 7.1% 21.1% Overview Sacramento County was politically competitive in most presidential elections between 1952-2004, but now votes significantly in favor of the candidates.

Candidates from the Democratic Party have carried the county in the past seven presidential elections, and have won a majority of the county's votes thrice during that time (in , and ). The city of is strongly Democratic, while rural areas are strongly ; suburban areas are more divided.

This pattern is also present in congressional and state legislative elections. The last Republican presidential candidate to win a majority in the county was in . Sacramento County vote by party in presidential elections Year Others 33.75% 189,789 57.98% 326,023 8.26% 46,473 39.13% 202,514 58.06% 300,503 2.81% 14,565 39.34% 213,583 58.30% 316,506 2.35% 12,770 49.29% 235,539 49.52% 236,657 1.19% 5,670 45.33% 195,619 49.31% 212,792 5.36% 23,139 40.76% 166,049 49.83% 203,019 9.42% 38,346 35.36% 160,366 43.56% 197,540 21.08% 95,606 51.01% 201,832 47.65% 188,557 1.34% 5,301 55.56% 204,922 43.14% 159,128 1.30% 4,791 47.72% 153,721 40.37% 130,031 11.91% 38,368 44.63% 123,110 52.27% 144,203 3.10% 8,563 49.00% 141,218 47.63% 137,287 3.37% 9,716 41.66% 97,177 50.92% 118,769 7.42% 17,300 34.17% 77,871 65.68% 149,668 0.15% 332 43.26% 84,252 56.32% 109,695 0.42% 809 45.10% 67,686 54.73% 82,134 0.17% 260 49.02% 67,207 50.37% 69,066 0.61% 837 37.78% 35,074 58.38% 54,197 3.85% 3,571 33.16% 24,611 66.30% 49,204 0.54% 403 30.76% 23,201 68.09% 51,351 1.15% 864 20.14% 12,119 78.53% 47,265 1.33% 800 27.74% 14,553 69.32% 36,370 2.94% 1,542 50.83% 20,762 48.19% 19,684 0.99% 403 41.08% 13,400 7.01% 2,285 51.91% 16,932 64.87% 15,634 29.67% 7,150 5.46% 1,316 40.19% 10,696 54.63% 14,538 5.18% 1,379 0.19% 36 51.39% 9,869 48.43% 9,300 55.15% 6,515 38.37% 4,533 6.48% 766 65.23% 6,666 23.33% 2,384 11.45% 1,170 54.78% 5,506 43.03% 4,325 2.19% 220 47.68% 4,600 50.07% 4,831 2.25% 217 48.92% 4,362 39.23% 3,498 11.85% 1,057 Conversely, in gubernatorial elections the county often favors Republican candidates, most recently doing so in 2002, 2003 and 2006.

Sacramento County vote by party in gubernatorial elections Year 37.7% 122,342 62.3% 202,416 38.5% 162,369 56.7% 239,599 60.5% 218,889 34.2% 123,685 52.3% 195,435 26.5% 98,877 46.6% 147,456 40.8% 129,143 39.7% 142,970 57.4% 206,870 54.8% 196,229 40.9% 146,423 50.3% 167,982 44.7% 149,215 68.1% 207,086 30.1% 91,660 52.4% 171,176 44.7% 146,167 34.7% 88,445 54.9% 139,821 45.9% 104,595 51.6% 117,711 46.0% 105,523 52.5% 120,365 50.9% 109,801 49.1% 105,861 37.7% 71,788 60.7% 115,462 In the , all of and portions of its , , and districts are in the county.

In the , all of the and districts and parts of the , , and districts are in the county. In the , parts of the , , , , and districts are in the county. According to the , as of October 22, 2012, Sacramento County has 698,899 registered voters, out of 944,243 eligible (74%). Of those, 306,960 (44%) are registered Democrats, 225,688 (32%) are registered , and 134,677 (19%) have a political party. The following table includes the number of incidents reported and the rate per 1,000 persons for each type of offense.

Population and crime rates Population 1,408,480 Violent crime 8,988 6.38 Homicide 70 0.05 Forcible rape 448 0.32 Robbery 3,282 2.33 Aggravated assault 5,188 3.68 Property crime 31,835 22.60 Burglary 12,526 8.89 Larceny-theft 30,971 21.99 Motor vehicle theft 8,624 6.12 Arson 366 0.26 Cities by population and crime rates Cities by population and crime rates City Population Violent crimes Violent crime rate per 1,000 persons Property crimes Property crime rate per 1,000 persons 85,112 329 3.87 3,117 36.62 156,344 512 3.27 3,292 21.06 73,678 85 1.15 1,277 17.33 24,163 59 2.44 470 19.45 66,214 393 5.94 2,107 31.82 476,557 3,520 7.39 19,967 41.90 Pocket-Greenhaven Major highways • • • • • • • • • Airports is a major, full-service airport with passenger flights.

It is owned by the County of Sacramento. The County also owns in and , both of which are general aviation airports. There are also privately owned public use airports located in Elk Grove and Rio Linda. Public roadways The Sacramento County Department of Transportation (SACDOT) maintains approximately 2200 miles of roadway within the unincorporated area.

The roads range from six lane thoroughfares to rural roads. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Unincorporated community • Population ranking The population ranking of the following table is based on the of Sacramento County.

† county seat Rank City/town/etc. Municipal type Population (2010 Census) 1 † () City 466,488 2 City 153,015 3 CDP 92,186 4 City 83,301 5 City 72,203 6 City 64,776 7 CDP 61,762 8 CDP 47,513 9 CDP 45,770 10 CDP 42,694 11 CDP 33,960 12 CDP 33,121 13 CDP 30,912 14 CDP 24,836 15 City 23,647 16 CDP 22,681 17 CDP 15,106 18 CDP 14,670 19 CDP 13,729 20 CDP 10,802 21 CDP 7,912 22 CDP 5,800 23 CDP 5,492 24 CDP 5,488 25 CDP 5,363 26 CDP 4,451 27 CDP 1,542 28 CDP 1,195 29 CDP 1,184 30 City 804 31 CDP 743 32 CDP 355 33 CDP 271 34 CDP 155 35 CDP 38 • .

California State Association of Counties . Retrieved February 6, 2015. • ^ . United States Census Bureau . Retrieved April 6, 2016. • ^ . Retrieved June 9, 2017. • . National Association of Counties .

Retrieved 2011-06-07. • . United States Census Bureau. August 22, 2012 . Retrieved October 4, 2015. • ^ U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table B02001. . Retrieved 2013-10-26. • ^ U.S. Census Bureau.

American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table B03003. . Retrieved 2013-10-26. • ^ U.S. Census Bureau.

American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table B19301. . Retrieved 2013-10-21. • ^ U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table B19013. . Retrieved 2013-10-21. • ^ U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table B19113.

. Retrieved 2013-10-21. • ^ U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. . Retrieved 2013-10-21. • U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table B01003. . Retrieved 2013-10-21. • ^ Data unavailable • . United States Census Bureau . Retrieved October 4, 2015. • . University of Virginia Library . Retrieved October 4, 2015. • Forstall, Richard L., ed.

(March 27, 1995). . United States Census Bureau . Retrieved October 4, 2015. • (PDF). United States Census Bureau. April 2, 2001 . Retrieved October 4, 2015. • . . • .

. Retrieved 2011-05-14. • California Government Code § 23004 • ^ California Secretary of State. November 3, 2013, at the .. Retrieved 2013-10-31. • Leip, David. . uselectionatlas.org . Retrieved 2018-09-01. • . Civic Impulse, LLC . Retrieved March 1, 2013. • November 18, 2012, at the . • ^ Office of the Attorney General, Department of Justice, State of California.

December 2, 2013, at the .. Retrieved 2013-11-14. • Only larceny-theft cases involving property over $400 in value are reported as property crimes. • ^ United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. . Retrieved 2013-11-14. • • •


best matchmakers sacramento county ca

best matchmakers sacramento county ca - Best Sacramento County Jobs and Salaries


best matchmakers sacramento county ca

Sacramento County is located in California with a population of 1,479,300. Living in Sacramento County offers residents a suburban feel and most residents own their homes.

In Sacramento County there are a lot of bars, restaurants, coffee shops, and parks. Many families and young professionals live in Sacramento County and residents tend to be liberal.

The public schools in Sacramento County are above average. Niche may be compensated by the third party lenders and others who place ads on the website. Niche is not a lender and does not endorse the products of these advertisers. Fees that Niche receives for ads do not affect the terms you may be offered by the lender you choose. There are many additional borrowing options available. I fell in love with the diversity that Sacramento has to offer!

There are so many cultures represented in the city, so much awesome food and community events. There are many alternatives to driving for example: bus, lightrail, uber, rental bikes around the city.

There are countless schools for both children and adults, farmer's markets year round, close to airports and train stations.

The only downfall is the rising cost of housing. I have lived in sacramento for 10 years, quite by accident. We moved for our careers but fell in love and now call it home. The " City of Trees" leave canopy shades two major rivers with hiking, boating, swimming, and rafting.

Midtown is bustling with a variety of dining. Museums include the California, Crocker Art, Old Sacramento, Railroad. The crown jewel is of course the State Capitol and surrounding grounds Schools include public, private, or charter, with curriculums suited for all. Two excellent junior colleges, Sac State, University of Cal Davis, with extensions of University of San Francisco and University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law are for higher ed.

The State Fair, and various concerts come to town. NBA Kings occupy Golden One arena. 90 minutes east are the ski slopes, 90 miles west Is San Francisco. There is an international airport and train station too. It's a wonderful place to call home! Sacramento has a lot of amazing places. Many people can enjoy its beautiful parks, where family, friends, and relatives can developed different recreational activities.

In addition, Sacramento has diverse restaurants, museums like the California Automobile Museum, and places to shop and dance. The only thing I do not like about Sacramento is the indigents. Indigents give to the City a very bad aspect. They transit freely the streets, but I disagree their appearance and the way they don't take shower. Just if they had a place to clean themselves would be fantastic!


best matchmakers sacramento county ca

The IJL difference The Face-to-Face experience: As an It’s Just Lunch Sacramento client, we guarantee you will go out on dates. Face to face dates. Real dates. Because that’s the only way to tell if there’s chemistry. Personalized Hand-Selected Matches. Our IJL certified matchmakers create a dating experience personalized just for you. High Touch Service. From match selection to restaurant reservations. We are your dating concierge. Spend your time dating instead of searching.

Private. No online dating profile for the world to see. 27 Years’ Experience working with single professionals. It’s Just Lunch is the #1 Personalized Matchmaking service in the world! Our professional matchmakers love what they do- and that’s what makes them extraordinary.

We understand how important discovering chemistry is to our clients. Our goal is to get you face to face with someone you can really click with and let you take it from there. And while online dating sites leave the work to you, the It’s Just Lunch Sacramento matchmaking team not only selects your matches but also coordinates the entire date so you can focus on the fun parts of dating! Our Pledge to You, Our Client: We treat you as a person, not a website profile.

It's Just Lunch recognizes that each of our clients is unique, and that their attributes, experiences and life goals shape the type of relationship they are looking for. As such, we are committed to working with our clients to understand their needs and provide a successful, fun and productive IJL Dating Experience.

The It's Just Lunch team is dedicated to you, and this is our commitment to our clients: • To guide you through the It's Just Lunch dating process so you can have a fun, successful dating experience. • To understand your relationship goals and work closely with you to achieve them.

• To work with you to identify and provide you with the types of matches that could be right for you. We will honor your preferences for age, religion, and parental status as we personally select your matches. • To only take on those clients we believe we can successfully match-we don't take everyone on as an It's Just Lunch Client. • To quickly respond to your questions and needs. • To communicate with you in an open, honest way.

• To treat you in a caring, sincere, empathetic, and professional manner. • To maintain the highest ethical, personal and professional standards possible and follow all applicable laws. We will be measured both personally and professionally by our dedication to providing each and every one of our clients with the best matchmaking service possible! In short, if we take you on as a client, we guarantee you will go out on dates!

Its Just Lunch Select your city • United States • • Alabama • • Arizona • • • Arkansas • California • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Colorado • • • • Connecticut • • • Delaware • Florida • • • • • • • • • • Georgia • • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • • Indiana • Iowa • • Kansas • Kentucky • • Louisiana • • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • • Minnesota • • • • Mississippi • Missouri • • Nebraska • Nevada • • New Hampshire • New Jersey • • • New Mexico • New York • • • • • • North Carolina • • • • Ohio • • • • • • Oklahoma • • Oregon • Pennsylvania • • • Rhode Island • South Carolina • • • • Tennessee • • • Texas • • • • • Utah • Virginia • • • • • Washington • • Washington DC • Wisconsin • • • Canada • • Alberta • • British Columbia • • • Ontario • United Kingdom • • London • Australia • • New South Wales • Queensland • Victoria • Ireland • • Ireland


Malibu Matchmakers Malibu CA Matchmaker Malibu Matchmaking Malibu Dating Agency
Best matchmakers sacramento county ca Rating: 6,1/10 326 reviews
Categories: best