Примеры перевода, содержащие „best match“ – Русско-английский словарь и система поиска по миллионам русских. Предложить в качестве перевода для „best match“.
Score Match is a brand new soccer game for Android from the creators of Score Hero game. It features real-time multiplayer mode in which the only task that you have to complete is defeating the opponent. But it would not be easy because you are playing against real players from all over the world. Score Match – Get Started Genre; Sports, Online Multiplayer Score Match game starts with a tutorial in which you learn about the basic of the game; how to pass the ball to other players, how to score goals, tackle, steal the ball, cash management, about boxes, formation of the team, upgrading, and many more things.
Once the tutorial ends, the player can manage all the things manually. Score Match game features many types of matches; Junior, Amateur, Semi-Pro, Professional, Deluxe, Premier, Supreme, Elite, Master, and Legend.
It has no single player mode, so every time you play against real players. You start Score Match game from Junior level. Also, see – Score Match – Matches Level Cost of matches depends on the level you are going to play; Junior matches cost you 100 cash, Semi-Pro cost you 800 cash, and so on.
So cash is one of the valuable resources in Score Match game. To unlock new game matches, you need stars. You earn stars by defeating players in matches. Also, see – Score Match – Gameplay Tap on the play match button to start the game, you will play against real players from all over the world.
After the selection of opponent, you can bid to take advantage; cost you gems. If both the players bid, then the player who spends high will get the advantage.
If you want to kick-off, then you should . You can ignore or tap on the “No ” option. There is a fixed time duration of the matches; 2 minutes. The player who scores 2 goals first will get the victory or the player who has more points at the end of the match will get the victory. If at the end of the match, both the player has equal points, then penalty shoot-out determines the victory. Also, see – Score Match – Cash & Gems earning ways Without cash, you can not play matches. If you have gems, then you can exchange them for cash.
But if you have nothing, then you need to wait for free packages/boxes. The free package opens after every three hours, these packages rewards you cash, gems, upgrading cards, and much more. Amount of cash from these free packages is enough to play junior matches.
Don’t waste the cash, play carefully and earn the prize. Also, see – Goal Package You can claim this package once you complete the number of goals. After claiming the package, you need to wait for many hours to get benefit from this feature.
Arena Boxes These boxes can be earned by getting victories in matches. You can open them instantly in exchange for gems or wait for few hours. Also, see – So there are many ways in Score Match game to earn cash, but one of the best is getting back-to-back victories.
Unlock new arenas to win more cash & stars. Also, see – Score Match Game – Players Head to formation section and there you can change the positions of players or the placement of players. Upgrading these players help you to improve the overall performance; speed, strength, skill, response, shoot, dribble, pass, and more.
So upgrading also benefits you. But how to upgrade players in Score Match game? You need player cards to upgrade your players. These cards can be collected from free packages, goal packages, and from the arena boxes. Also, see – Formations You can also change the placement of players; the total number of players – 11, you can choose these formations; 4-4-2, 4-3-3, 4-2-3-1, 5-3-2, and more.
Unlock More Features of Score Match Game Log into Facebook and you can access to more features and earn more rewards too. Get a goal package, play across multiple devices, play for friends’ team, add friends to your team, and more are some features & rewards. Also, see – Tips & Cheats for Score Match game • You can easily win all the matches in Score Match game if you pass the ball by targetting the player carefully, use tackle feature at right time, take advantage of free kick/penalty shootouts.
Don’t let your opponent stealing the ball from you. • Using tackle feature at the right time help you to steal the ball from the opponent. • Score two goals to finish the match. • Tap on the player(target player) to pass ball easily • Always keep the ball with you • Keep away opponents • Don’t upgrade your players when you have not a rich amount of cash • When you are out of cash in Score Match game, open free packages, unlock boxes • Play Junior matches when you have not a rich amount of cash Earn cash and keep playing the Score Match game.
Also, see – Closing words on Score Match game Score Match is a great soccer . It has good graphics, highly addictive gameplay, featuring good commentary, challenging matches.
If you love soccer , then you should give it a try. Download Soccer Match game – (Google Play Store). It drains my battery!! Also, see –
best matchmaking scores - t test
Making sure players experience quality matches as they play SMITE is one of our top priorities. We wanted to give you insight into how the system works at a base level, as well as how the system varies when it comes to League matches. What is Matchmaking? Matchmaking is a term used to describe how we determine which players are going to be paired up to fight. The matchmaking system tries to ensure each team has an even chance at winning any given match.
It does this by pairing similarly skilled players with and against each other. GENERAL MATCHMAKING FAQ How does the system work?
The system we use is a modified version of the TrueSkill System. The system tracks how players perform and assigns a Matchmaking Rating and a Variance score to the player. The Matchmaking Rating (Hereby called MMR ) is how skilled the system thinks a player is. The Variance value is how confident the system is that the assigned MMR is accurate. When paired together, Variance is used to determine how fast a player’s MMR should change from any given match, and MMR is used as the main tool for pairing players together.
As we collect more data on a particular player, the Variance value will go down showing the system’s increased confidence that it has an accurate MMR. What does the system consider a good match? The system itself is running through thousands of simulated matches every second looking for a quality game for players. It looks for similar MMR values, similar levels, and wants to make sure the highest MMR isn’t too far away from the lowest MMR value.
It also has to make sure players don’t wait too long and parties of 4 or 5 are heavily favored to play with each other. If all of these values are close together, the system views this as a good match, and pulls all of those players into a match.
Sometimes the system can’t meet all of the requirements, leaving players in a longer queue. To make sure these players will get a match, as the time in queue rises the qualifications for what is considered a good match becomes more and more relaxed until a match is found. An example of a good match would look like this: If a match isn’t considered even, there are systems in place to compensate a team.
The underdog will lose less MMR and TP (League) for losing, and if they win they gain more. This also goes for the reverse scenario; the favored are expected to win and will gain less for winning, and lose more for losing. How does player level affect the matchmaking system? Player level is considered in all casual queues. The system heavily favors pairing players within similar level groups, but sometimes it will grab players from other level ranges if a good match cannot be found within an allotted amount of time.
Since the system heavily favors pairing similar MMR and similar level, finding matches during low populations times can be difficult, and as such the restrictions are lowered if players have to wait in queue for an extended time.
How does party size affect the matchmaking system? Party Size affects matchmaking in a few ways. First, when parties are paired together, their MMR is calculated using a formula to approximate what their MMR is together. This considers the idea that being in a party adds synergy that wouldn’t otherwise be there, and experienced players in a party adds greater synergy.
Second, parties of 4 or 5 are heavily favored to fight against similarly sized parties. Parties of 2 or 3 don’t have any restrictions applied to them. Do I have different MMR Values and Variances for the different game modes?
Yes. Each game mode is tracked separately as they all require different skillsets to be measured. My play has recently seen a large improvement. Will the system recognize this and let me rise? Yes. We make sure the variance always stays high enough to allow significant movement if a player is able to establish a new level of play.
What extra rules are in place for exceptional players? We have rules specifically designed to place players at the highest end of the spectrum together.
Players at the top will be heavily weighted to only face other players at the top, but this isn’t always possible at any given time. If no suitable match can be made within an allotted time, this rule is discarded as it can result in very long queue times.
This rule is in place for the main causal queues as well as League. LEAGUE MATCHMAKING FAQ How is League Matchmaking different? The specific differences are the inclusion of Qualifying Games, stricter restrictions on who can play each other, and how Tier Placement relates to your MMR.
Besides these, the system follows the same rules as Casual Matchmaking. How does my Tier Placement relate to my MMR?
Tier Placement isn’t considered when it comes to matchmaking , only a player’s MMR is considered. A player’s Tier Placement should be seen as an indication of where their MMR is likely around (Gold III being around 1200-1400 MMR).
In a situation where a player’s MMR begins to deviate positively from where their Tier Placement would suggest, the system becomes more generous with Tier Point gains, and less punishing with Tier Point losses until a player’s Tier Placement matches their MMR. Below is a chart explaining the MMR ranges of each Tier : What are Qualifying Games?
When first entering League, you will be required to play 10 Qualifying games. Your MMR starts at the average MMR for everyone in the system, and your Variance is set to be very high. After playing 10 games, the system will place you into a Tier. How high can I be placed after my Qualifying Games? The highest players can be placed after Qualifying games is Gold I.
( This is a recent change that will take effect as of the Xing Tian Patch for PC. Xbox players can expect to receive this change when they receive Xing Tian.) What are the goals of Qualifying Games? Qualifying Matches help to get a rough feel for the skill of the player, and where their initial placement in the League system should be. After 10 games the system will place a player on the lower side of their skill band once qualified, allowing for room to grow.
It is important to note that your variance will still be high after these 10 games. This means if you got lucky/unlucky in these first few games, you aren’t stuck too high or too low. The system still keeps a high variance until it becomes more sure. The system is confident with the majority of players as it gets closer to 40 games. What extra rules apply only to League? Qualifying players will never be matched with a Platinum, Diamond, or Masters player.
Also at the most extreme MMR differences players will not be matched regardless of time waiting in the queue. Update : Post Matchmaking FAQ Questions Reddit user posted a series of questions in a Reddit Thread talking about concerns with the Matchmaking System. While some of these are answered here, we felt hit questions hit some of the core concerns players had and feel it is appropriate to show the questions and answers to the questions here.
These were taken from a discussion on the Smite Subreddit between /u/Perkinz (and one from /u/SergeofBIBEK) and our Community Manager HiRezPonPon. How does it decide whether two teams are equal in skill? Player by player or the team’s averaged total—–Does it try to avoid situations where there’s a wide variance in the skill levels of individual players but a technically equal level of skill between the teams? The system averages out the teams MMR values and pairs them against another groups.
There is weighting that comes into play with parties that will “boost” the values to account for teamwork, but the goal is to make both sides even. It also tries to do this with as small of a variance as possible between individual MMR values. In a 2v2 example, a 1000 + 1100 vs a 950 + 1200 would be a more likely match than a 200 + 2000 vs. 800 + 1400 even though the second example is 100% even if you just add the scores.
It knows large differences between individual MMR values in the group is a bad thing and will only do something like this when a match simply cannot be found otherwise. Does it become less strict the longer you sit in queue—-If so, how long must you wait before it just goes “F* ** it, you’ve waited long enough, I’ll just place you in a match to get you in game”—Is it gradual or is there a specific threshold?
Yes. The system gets less strict as time goes on. Different queues have different “that’s it, we are doing it now” times set to them and get increasingly lax until they hit that time. There are some hard limits to what it can try to do to balance the match, and even more restrictions on Ranked to avoid the worst case scenarios.
Does it factor in things like ping? No. Ping can vary depending on connection quality and can change rapidly, plus in theory balancing for it would be double penalizing to those with not so stellar connections, since they would already be biased to perform worse than if they had a solid connection.
Does it factor in premade vs randoms? Yes. The system tries to pair matching party sizes together. This isn’t always possible. See ALG doing a 5 man premade in casuals and stomping my face in, happened about 2-3 weeks ago.
The matchmaker was given a pretty impossible task. “Here are 5 pro players on a coordinated team, all with grandmaster MMRs. Find a match to pair them with.” Unless Eager joined the queue then, there simply isn’t going to be one within the time allotment for a match to be made, resulting in some cases where matches have a Premade vs.
Non-premade. My example there was a bit extreme, but parties are inherintly harder to match. They also become even more difficult when there are difficult cases presented such as the ALG 5 man or even a level 30 players introducing his level 2 and level 5 friend to Smite. How does it handle placing multiple premades together (I ask because oftentimes I’ll see matches where one team is comprised of a 3 man and a 2 man (AKA 3+2) or a 2+2+1 while the other team is a 1+1+1+1+1 and I’m just like “Why the f*** didn’t they put one of those 2 mans on the other team instead of giving one team both of them) As stated above, it will try to balance parties so that teams fight teams when it makes sense.
In a situation where it is 3 + 2 vs. 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 the system looked at the teams, weighed the teams accordingly, and found that a more balanced match came from that config. This likely means the players on the Solo side are overall individually more skilled and could outweigh the bonus (both the literal bonus of coordination and the extra MMR weight we put them at) of the enemy team being coordinated.
Is it an “actual” queue where it puts you in a specific order and matches people based on history/location/etc after factoring in that order? Or is it purely a pool of every player in queue at that moment? The matchmaker itself has been described to me as follows : Every “tick” which is a small defined window of time, the system goes through all the available players and runs match simulations (thousands of them).
These simulations look to average out the values of the team, see how close the values were and then see if a match is solid. If so, it throws them all into a match and they are off. When a player who has been in the queue for a long time gets thrown into these simulations they lower the threshold of what is considered a “solid” game to attempt to get into a game.
Once “max” time is reached, the system does another round of simulations and finds the best it can muster and lets that one go. So a quicker answer to this question is more like, “It selects from all available players, while players waiting longer have a bit more bias on them to get a match to pop.” Does it factor in the chaos/order winrate bias like TP does?
I am actually not sure what our Chaos/Order winrate difference is at the moment, but historically it has been largely insignificant. As far as I know TP has no bias on it depending on the side you are on. It “kinda” did earlier this season if you were in a particular situation but that bug was squashed in the early half of this year and has not been around since.
Why is it that Smite’s matchmaking feels so far from accurate/fair/correct compared to the dozens of other games I’ve played in my lifetime? – /u/SergeofBIBEK MOBAs are inherently more sensitive to differences in team strength. In a shooter for example, nobody is gaining levels on you because a teammate is doing poorly. They might get a number/map presence advantage, but not a stat based one. In a MOBA someone doing poorly can cause a snowball effect which results in some bad situations. I also think there is some merit to the argument that a players “MMR Range” is wider in a MOBA as well.
An MMR range is where a player normally falls. A player isn’t 1000 MMR, they are more like 850 – 1150 MMR, depending on their mood that day, understanding of particular matchups, and individual god strengths.
In Chess, your “Elo Range” is probably much tighter since there are less variables, leading to the system just being more accurate because of the game. After spending a ton of time with the MMing guys downstairs, I do feel confident that Smite does the best it can given the data set that it has while also making sure players get into matches.
Thanks for reading our matchmaking FAQ! We hope this answered questions you may have had about our system! For any other questions regarding matchmaking, tweet .
Over the past several months we’ve been working on improving matchmaking. In this post we’d like to share with you where matchmaking currently stands and give you a sneak peek on an upcoming matchmaking feature.
Ranked Matchmaking is Coming The next major update will add a ranked matchmaking feature to the game. This mode is aimed at experienced players who want to play in a more competitive environment and know their matchmaking rating (MMR).
Dota 2 matchmaking has always calculated MMR and used it to form matches; in ranked matchmaking we make that MMR visible. Here’s what you need to know about ranked matchmaking: • Ranked matchmaking is unlocked after approximately 150 games.
• All players in the party must have unlocked the mode. • Currently, only All Pick, Captains Mode, and Captains Draft are available. • You may not participate in ranked matchmaking while in the low priority pool. • Coaches are not allowed in ranked matchmaking. • Matches played in normal matchmaking do not impact your ranked matchmaking MMR, and vice versa. • Your ranked MMR is visible only to you and your friends. The MMR used for normal matchmaking is not visible. • When you first start using ranked matchmaking, you will enter a calibration phase of 10 games.
During this time, your ranked MMR will not be visible. Your Matchmaking Rating (MMR) Dota 2 uses standard techniques to quantify and track player skill. We assign each player an MMR, which is a summary metric that quantifies your skill at Dota 2. After each match, we update your MMR based on what happened in that match. In general, when you win, your MMR will go up, and when you lose, your MMR will go down. Win/loss is the primary criteria used to update MMR, but individual performance also plays a role, especially when our uncertainty about your MMR is high.
It is possible for an individual MMR to increase after a loss or decrease after a win, but in general the winning team’s average MMR will increase and the losing team’s MMR will decrease.
We also track our uncertainty about your MMR. New accounts and those playing in Ranked Matchmaking for the first time have high uncertainty. Higher uncertainty allows larger adjustments after each match, and lower uncertainty leads to smaller adjustments. Together, the MMR and uncertainty can be interpreted as a probability distribution of performance in your next game; the MMR itself serves as the mean of this distribution and the uncertainty is its standard deviation.
If the match outcomes (both the win/loss and individual performance) repeatedly match our expectations, the uncertainty tends to decrease until it reaches a floor. A surprising match outcome will tend to cause an increase in uncertainty. We actually track a total of four MMRs for each player: • Normal matchmaking, queuing solo • Normal matchmaking, queuing with a party • Ranked matchmaking, queuing solo • Ranked matchmaking, queuing with a party Each of the two ranked MMRs has its own calibration period.
Under certain circumstances, we may need to reactivate calibration, if we think the MMR is inaccurate. To give you a feel for the range of MMR, below are some MMRs corresponding to various percentiles.
5% 1100 10% 1500 25% 2000 50% 2250 75% 2731 90% 3200 95% 3900 99% 4100 Note that this distribution is from normal matchmaking. We don’t know yet what the distribution will be in ranked matchmaking, but we expect it to be different. The players who participate in ranked matchmaking will be more skilled, more experienced players. We anticipate that any given player will have different expectations and play the game differently in ranked matchmaking compared to normal matchmaking.
What Makes a Good Match? The ultimate goal of automated matchmaking in Dota 2 is for players to enjoy the game. The matchmaker seeks matches with the following properties (listed in no particular order): • The teams are balanced.
(Each team has a 50% chance to win.) • The discrepancy in skill between the most and least skilled player in the match is minimized.
This is related to team balance, but not the same thing. • The discrepancy between experience (measured by the number of games played) between the least experienced player and the most experienced player is minimized.
More on this below. • The highest skill Radiant player should be close to the same skill as the highest skill Dire player. • Each team contains about the same number of parties. For example, the matchmaker tries to avoid matching a party of 5 against against 5 individual players.
• Players’ language preferences contains a common language. Lack of a common language among teammates’ language preferences is strongly avoided.
Lack of a common language across the whole match is also avoided, but less strongly. • Wait times shouldn’t be too long. The matchmaker seldom achieves all of those goals perfectly. For any potential match, the matchmaker assigns a quality score for each of the criteria above and then takes a weighted average.
When the overall quality score exceeds a threshold, the match is considered “good enough” and the match is formed. We’re constantly experimenting with different match criteria and how to prioritize them. The matchmaker does not directly try to achieve any particular win rate for players.
However, we do try to ensure that each team has a 50% chance of winning in any given match. (This is criteria #1 in the listed above.) We do not examine individual win / loss streaks or try to end them. However, if you are on a winning streak, in general your MMR is probably rising, which will tend to cause you to be matched with higher skilled opponents and teammates. Win rate is not a meaningful measure of player skill.
Win count is also not useful as indicator of skill, and the matchmaker does not use it for that purpose. We do try to group players by their level of experience (criteria #3 in the list above), primarily because we have found that players at the same skill level but different experience level differ in their expectations of how the game is to be played.
Our measurement of “experience” for matchmaking purposes is an approximately logarithmic function of the number of games played. The difference in experience between 40 games and 120 games is considered to be about the same as the difference between 120 games and 280. You can visualize the impact of goals #2 and #3 with a chart where number of games played is the horizontal axis and MMR is the vertical axis.
If two players are close together in the diagram, they are considered good candidates to put into a match together. Players who are far apart are considered a poor match.
The typical career trajectory of a player new to Dota 2 as he gains experience and moves towards the right is to gradually move upwards as their skill increases.
When skilled players create new accounts, they follow a bit different trajectory. Their MMR rises relatively quickly, placing them into the top lefthand corner of the diagram, where they will be matched with other players whose skill is high relative to their experience level.
What About Parties? When parties are involved, things get a bit more complicated. Parties often contain players with a wide discrepancy in skill and experience.
For the purposes of measuring the goodness-of-fit criteria listed as #2 and #3 above, the matchmaker assigns each party aggregate skill and experience numbers. It is these party numbers that are used rather than the individual. In general, when a party with a wide skill range is matched with a solo player, the solo player will have skill and experience near the average of the party.
If you notice that one player seems to be significantly less skilled than the other players in the match, it is very likely that they are partied with a high skilled player. Also, when players are in a party, they typically perform better than players of equivalent skill who don’t know each other. We account for this in two ways. First, we track your skill when queuing alone separately from when queuing in a party.
Second, we adjust the effective MMRs based on the number of players in the party and the distribution of skill within the party. Here’s an example match that was formed today that demonstrates both of these principles in action. RADIANT DIRE Party MMR AdjMMR Party MMR AdjMMR D 2994 3003 C 3046 3062 F 2788 2788 C 2920 2936 A 2687 2687 E 2716 2716 F 2626 2627 B 2672 2672 D 2401 2410 C 2100 2116 TOTAL 13515 TOTAL 13502 Observe that the average adjusted MMR for all of the parties is around 2700.
When the players on a team are sorted by adjusted rank, as they are above, the solo players tend to be bracketed above and below by players playing in parties; furthermore, a party with a smaller MMR spread (party F) tends to get bracketed by a party with a larger MMR spread (party D).
These patterns are typical. Also notice that party D got a bigger MMR adjustment as a result of the larger MRR spread. Party F, which is formed of players of more equal skill, received a lower bonus. These adjustments were determined using statistical tools (more on this below), but an intuitive explanation is that your performance improves more when partying with a higher skilled player than it does when playing with another player of your same skill.
Data Driven Process Measuring success in matchmaking is difficult. Players’ appraisals of matchmaking quality are highly correlated with their recent win rate. This includes the members of the Dota 2 team! To avoid emotion and small sample size leading us to “Matchmaking is working well; I’ve been winning”, we try to make design decisions objectively using data. Fortunately, we gather a lot of it.
For example, you might wonder how we determined how to adjust effective MMRs to account for the fact that players in a party tend to perform better than players of equivalent skill queuing solo. We used a statistical tool known as logistic regression, which essentially works by trying to create a function that predicts the odds of victory.
This function contains several coefficients which determine the MMR bonus given to players in a party. Then we use numerical techniques to solve for the coefficients that produce the function which is most accurately able to predict the match outcome. Another example of how data drives the matchmaking design process is in deciding when a match is “good enough” and should be accepted, and when we should keep you waiting in hopes of a better match.
To help tune this threshold, we start with a measure of match quality. The ultimate goal of matchmaking is fun, and we have several metrics which we use to measure match quality.
One such metric measures balance, based on the difference in gold farmed. To be more precise, it’s the time integral of the gold difference, measured since the last point in the game where the difference was zero.
This is easily visualized on the gold difference graph. Find the last time when the graph crosses zero, and then measure the area between the horizontal axis and the graph. In general, the smaller this area is, the closer the game was. Although at one point in this match the Dire had a 10K gold advantage, the Radiant came back and then pulled ahead, only to have their gold lead reversed again.
Despite the fact that at one point in time one team appeared to have a significant lead, our balance calculation judges this match a close game. Armed with this metric (among others) we have an experimental way to tune the wait time thresholds. We make an adjustment to the threshold, and then observe what this does to the quality of matches, as measured by the distribution of the match balance metric.
It’s not critical if the metric misidentifies some edge cases (a game that it measures as close was actually a blowout), since we are typically are only concerned with the aggregate response after making a change. Conclusion Hopefully this blog post has given you some insight into how the matchmaker currently works, as well as how we evaluate success and make design decisions.
Like most everything else we do, matchmaking is subject to constant reevaluation. Matchmaking will never be perfect, and the technical details in this post refer to the current state of affairs and are likely to change as we find better approaches. We listen to your feedback, and we’re constantly working to improve.
CS:GO BEST PLAYS in MATCHMAKING