Only then is it re-encoded again, to just over 3mbit very very short for 720p. Either message the mod team if relevant, or make a post on the sub as normal. And further to the comment above about 1080p being compressed too much ie: 2 hour video around 9gigs is too much compression, it should be around 13 gigs for 2 hours. The thing I want to know is how much of a difference is there?. In the end, it's all about compression. If an encode is done right, chances are slim you will notice a difference.
It's possible to encode an x264 so close to the source now that it's basically irrelevant. Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman seek answers as the time-traveling trio of Mano, Persuader and Tharok terrorize Metropolis in search of budding Green Lantern, Jessica Cruz. The 8 gb mkv rips are stunning to me, example casino royale 8. I know the resolution would say so in theory, but what about real world results? You can't hear the difference anyway and it reduces the amount of bitrate needed for the audio by quite a bit. Yes, those have been recoded tons of times. I need to get the file size on these movies down to something reasonable. What does that overcompressed 1080p source look like beside 480p original dvd? I was amazed at how good they looked.
So much better it's not funny. Most 1080 mkvs tend to be just too tight on the bitrate front, so they really drop a lot of detail and start having some artifact problems. The worst you may see is blocking in dark scenes. Do not message moderators for help with your issues. That's more than a little tight, and a 1080p encode at that bitrate will certainly suffer with most content. Alternatively try , , , , , , ,. Redundant questions that have been previously answered will be removed.
The Scene compresses the video in their releases quite a bit, so there is some loss in video quality that is perceivable, though they are not very bad by any means. None of the files shown here are hosted or transmitted by this server. I ask as I haven't seen Blu-Ray but have seen a lot of mkv's and i'm very impressed with them. Animation Action Science Fiction Justice League vs. I know very well that bitrate isn't everything - bunch of other settings have to be tested and tweaked to get the desired result, but fact of the matter is I think we have two very different opinions on what constitutes quality loss in video encoding. With her unwilling help, they aim to free remaining Fatal Five members Emerald Empress and Validus to carry out their sinister plan. For trackers with open signup: or.
Depends on the bitrate and resolution, largely. There's also a lot of P2P groups that aim for transparency, i. For that same 2hr film, if you used 13. Try , , or instead. We are a thriving community dedicated to helping users old and new understand and use torrents. Submissions must be related to the discussion of digital piracy. Based on the encoder knowing what they are doing, would a 1080p source, encoded at 720P, still be better than a regular 480p dvd? Frankly, it's very impressive how good it looks at that end of that.
Framestor anf Hdmaniacs are ok for example. Lately, I've been getting a lot of 1080p and 720p rips and even though they might not be in the same league as a blu-ray. An epic battle against ultimate evil awaits! The links are provided solely by this site's users. Obviously some stuff compresses significantly better than others too. If you ever want to see quality Lost, check out the Bluray of season 3. By contrast, 720p only needs around 6mbit to look tremendous with most content, and that's easily doable even with the 8. Typically a near lossless encode is around 13gb and a very good, almost lossless is around 8-10gb.
Quality seems about the same with both of them but I would really need side by side monitors to compare them accurately. Just from playing around with both of them, it seems like the ati mpeg4 transcodes much faster. With the same note, I've compared couple of 720p rips with their 1080p rips and I did not see a big difference and in case of Hitman, 720p version looks better than the 1080p version maybe its because how it was ripped and encoded. You may not use this site to distribute or download any material when you do not have the legal rights to do so. I don't have any pictures or anything, but the higher res makes a huge difference and colors seem more vivid in an mkv. That makes sense - you're using an offline scaler instead of a realtime one, and using a gigantic bitrate for 720p so the extra re-encode has only a minimal hit on quality. In your example, you're comparing a Scene encode to a remux.
And further to the comment above about 1080p being compressed too much ie: 2 hour video around 9gigs is too much compression, it should be around 13 gigs for 2 hours. I know the resolution would say so in theory, but what about real world results? We only have a few, but they are important. After reading this post i decided to join this form. You can compress video by quite a bit and still end up with something that doesn't look too bad. It appears that the highest bitrate it will allow me to use is 9600kbps. It is your own responsibility to adhere to these terms. Please read over the rules before contributing.
If anyone else has used it, I'd be interested in what settings you use. Welcome to the torrents subreddit. The administrator of this site 0dayrls. Common Post Topics In no particular order. Based on the encoder knowing what they are doing, would a 1080p source, encoded at 720P, still be better than a regular 480p dvd? Most likely the term remux means it's the original compression off the source disk, untouched, just repackaged. What does that overcompressed 1080p source look like beside 480p original dvd? But the Justice League has also discovered an ally from another time in the peculiar Star Boy — brimming with volatile power, could he be the key to thwarting the Fatal Five? An encode like that will also not include the lossless audio track. Audio is the other obvious difference as mkv files don't usually include lossless audio.